<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Venix Flytrap&#039;s Anticlimax &#187; performance art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://venixflytrap.net/tag/performance-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://venixflytrap.net</link>
	<description>a play-in-words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 05:33:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Theory Chapter 1</title>
		<link>http://venixflytrap.net/2009/02/27/twitter-theory-chapter-1/</link>
		<comments>http://venixflytrap.net/2009/02/27/twitter-theory-chapter-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>venix</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intellectuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://venixflytrap.net/2009/02/27/twitter-theory-chapter-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter Theory: part one of a series regarding the How, Why, and What-for of Twitter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><cite>In Which She Posts a Comment on Thomas Dolby&#8217;s Blog.</cite></p>
<p><small><a href="http://blog.thomasdolby.com/?p=703#comment-36693">February 25th, 2009 at 3:30 am</a> </small></p>
<p><small></small>whether it’s a fad or not, Twitter’s an interesting development in communication.</p>
<p>i consider it micro performance art. thoughts in 140 characters or less, a restriction which lends well to haiku.
<p>and if one is engaged in a duel of @ replies and re-tweets, then one is more or less doing conversation as performance art.
<p>i suggest NOT managing your tweets. don’t try to drink from a firehose. just dip your feet in the stream.
<p>–Naomi, who subconsciously wrote each of these paragraphs to Twitter post specifications.
<p>&nbsp;
<p><em>(Belated thanks to </em><a title="The Fire Hose vs the Stream [kevnull.com]" href="http://kevnull.com/2009/02/the-fire-hose-vs-the-stream.html" target="_blank"><em>Kevin Cheng&#8217;s brilliant Twitter manifesto</em></a><em>, from whom I wantonly stole the firehose / stream thing.)</em></p>

<!-- start wp-tags-to-technorati 1.02 -->

<p class='technorati-tags'>Technorati Tags: <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/communication' rel='tag' target='_self'>communication</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/conversation' rel='tag' target='_self'>conversation</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/performance+art' rel='tag' target='_self'>performance art</a>, <a class='technorati-link' href='http://technorati.com/tag/twitter' rel='tag' target='_self'>twitter</a></p>

<!-- end wp-tags-to-technorati -->
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://venixflytrap.net/2009/02/27/twitter-theory-chapter-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

